Maryland Bar Bulletin
Publications : Bar Bulletin : February 2007


Maryland Judiciary Provides Template for Courts Worldwide

Russia faced a slew of daunting tasks in the early 1990s following the break-up of the Soviet Union; their path of reformation included settling the external debt of the USSR, suppressing the remnants of rebellion and refining the judicial system. For the latter assignment, the Russians turned to America in early 1996 for assistance. Upon their request, the US Congress contacted the Maryland Judiciary; ultimately, then-Judge Alan M. Wilner, Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, assumed the responsibility of assembling a three-man delegation (including himself) and traveling to the Northern Russian territory of Karelia to teach local government officials the procedures and various characteristics of a jury trial, which Russia had not performed in nearly 80 years.

The Russian
constitution required
there be jury trials for
certain cases, but . . .
there was hardly
anybody alive in
Russia that had seen
a jury trial.

Hon. Alan M. Wilner

"At the time, the Russian constitution required there be jury trials for certain cases," Wilner explains, "but they hadn't done them since 1917. There was hardly anybody alive in Russia that had seen a jury trial."

Wilner was appointed to this mission due to his status as the Maryland representative in the "Rule of Law Project," a federally-funded program created by the US State Department. This project aligned various American states with Russian regions in order to expand the field of international judiciary involvement and develop friendly relations.

Good intentions aside, Wilner still harbored a few reservations prior to making his first visit to Russia. After all, his grandparents had "fled Russia in terror" earlier in the century before coming to America, and he (along with his travel companions then-Court of Appeals Judge Howard S. Chasanow and then-Attorney General Joseph Curran) had lived through the height of the cold war. When he arrived, relations with the Russian delegates were "a little frosty," but the ice soon melted.

"When you talk to them, socially, you realize they are just like us," says Wilner. "They are intelligent, cultured and they knew a great deal more about the United States than the Americans knew about Russia."

The cavalry's arrival spread like wildfire through the frigid territory and enticed a delegation from Leningrad to travel north to Karelia. There, the group from Leningrad befriended the Maryland representatives and brought them to St. Petersburg for a tour. Wilner's stay was short, but a few months later he arrived in Russia again and saw that they had made significant strides. He had sent the group from Leningrad a Russian-dubbed videotape that dissected the many aspects of a jury trial, including jury selection, deliberation, challenges and statements from the attorneys.

The Russians were now ready for a jury trial. Approximately 30 prosecutors, 30 judges and 20 attorneys were taught using a scripted mock-trial case and then, three days later, an actual trial was held as the local media swarmed the St. Petersburg courtroom, which had hosted the last jury trial before the Russian Revolution.

"It was a huge event," says Wilner. "So that started the relationship on a very high note. And from that, we just expanded into a bunch of different areas."

The success Wilner and the Maryland Judiciary experienced in Russia was special, but not entirely unique. Numerous Maryland judges and court-related officials have spent a sufficient amount of time traveling to other countries and spreading the components of the Maryland Court foundation. For example, Howard County Circuit Court Administrative Judge Diane O. Leasure traveled to the Republic of Georgia on behalf of the World Bank Project in the summer of 2002. She was there to speak of judicial reform and emphasize case-flow management, roles of an Administrative Judge and the principals of case management.

Nestled along the eastern shore of the Black Sea, Georgia's contrastive judicial system shocked Leasure as she cited the country's inability to "control the dockets" and how the attorneys controlled the cases.

"Attorneys could walk right out of a case if they didn't like the way things were going," notes Leasure.

Conversely, District Court of Maryland Chief Judge Ben C. Clyburn noted the Croatian government's strong-handed involvement during his travels in late-September of 2006.

"The Judge really conducts the proceedings, and the lawyers are not as active," explains Clyburn. "The lawyers get to make the opening and closing statements, but in terms of the cross- and direct examinations, the Judge does that. And then the Judge dictates to the stenographer what the records should reflect."

Already well-versed in foreign relations due to similar interactions with Nigeria and China on behalf of Maryland's District Court, Clyburn traveled to Croatia as that nation was rebuilding from its civil war and looking to model its courts after Maryland's District Court system in terms of independence and technology.

"When you are taken out of your environment, you get to really come back [and] appreciate what you have," says Clyburn. "You appreciate your strengths, plus you appreciate your weaknesses."

While the professional reward of spreading democratic values across the globe is quite grand, the personal satisfaction of aiding your fellow man is greatly appreciated and evident through the displays of good-nature these judges have received. Wilner, who has traveled to Russia over 20 times since his initial 1996 visit and planed his next trip for the spring of 2007, received several condolences via e-mail from Russian colleagues on September 12, 2001, not to mention being named an Honorary Professor at the Leningrad Regional State University Law School. Clyburn continues his relations with the countries he has visited and is currently being courted by Shanghai for a visit. In a global society where lines are drawn over skin color, religion and nationality, these men and women of the Maryland Judiciary forge beyond such barriers for the greater good of human rights.

"It was an indescribable experience," reflects Leasure. "I worked with gracious individuals… traveled the country and its courtrooms. It is one highlight of my judicial career."

previous next
Publications : Bar Bulletin: February 2007